Skip to content


Debigir Tapdhari Vs. Emperor - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtAllahabad
Decided On
Reported inAIR1925All322
AppellantDebigir Tapdhari
RespondentEmperor
Excerpt:
- .....purpose of serving it on him. debigir refused to take the summons and sign an acknowledgment. this is all that hag been proved in the case. the learned magistrate thinks that this is enough to constitute an offence under section 173 of the indian penal code and the learned sessions judge thinks that something more is necessary than a refusal to accept a summons for a conviction under the said section. i agree with the learned sessions judge.3. i accept the reference, set aside the conviction and sentence and order that the tine, if paid, be refunded.
Judgment:

Mukerji, J.

1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Bulandshahr with the recommendation that the conviction of one Debigir Tapdhari under Section 173 of the Indian Penal Code may be set aside and the fine inflicted may be remitted.

2. It appears that a police constable took a summons to Debigir Tapdhari for the purpose of serving it on him. Debigir refused to take the summons and sign an acknowledgment. This is all that hag been proved in the case. The learned Magistrate thinks that this is enough to constitute an offence under Section 173 of the Indian Penal Code and the learned Sessions Judge thinks that something more is necessary than a refusal to accept a summons for a conviction under the said section. I agree with the learned Sessions Judge.

3. I accept the reference, set aside the conviction and sentence and order that the tine, if paid, be refunded.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //