Skip to content


Syed Ali Ahmad Vs. Musammat Said-un-nisa Bibi - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectTenancy
CourtAllahabad
Decided On
Judge
Reported in6Ind.Cas.703a
AppellantSyed Ali Ahmad
RespondentMusammat Said-un-nisa Bibi
Excerpt:
agra tenancy act (ii of 1901), section 201 - 'shall presame'--recorded co-sharer--presumption rebuttable--revenue court--question of title--jurisdiction. - .....of both the lower courts and inasmuch as these decrees are based on the ruling in bechan singh v. karan singh 30 a. 447 : a.w.n. (1903) 186 : 5 a.l.j. 495 and a full bench of this court has overruled that decision, we direct that the case, which has been decided upon a preliminary point, be sent back to the court of first instance through the lower appellate court with a direction that it be re-listed in the file of pending suits and be disposed of according to law. costs here and hitherto will abide the event.
Judgment:

1. In view of the judgment-delivered on the 16th of May in Appeal No. 159 of 1909 under the Letters Patent Waris Ali Khan v. Parsotam Narain 6 Ind. Cas. 609, it is admitted that this appeal must succeed. We accordingly allow this appeal, set aside the decree of the learned Judge of this Court as also the decrees of both the lower Courts and inasmuch as these decrees are based on the ruling in Bechan Singh v. Karan Singh 30 A. 447 : A.W.N. (1903) 186 : 5 A.L.J. 495 and a Full Bench of this Court has overruled that decision, we direct that the case, which has been decided upon a preliminary point, be sent back to the Court of first instance through the lower appellate Court with a direction that it be re-listed in the file of pending suits and be disposed of according to law. Costs here and hitherto will abide the event.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //