Skip to content


M/S. Ramji Mal Govind Ram Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectDirect Taxation
CourtAllahabad High Court
Decided On
Case Number S.T. Ref. No. 429 of 1973
Reported in(1977)6CTR(All)166
AppellantM/S. Ramji Mal Govind Ram
RespondentCommissioner of Sales Tax.
Excerpt:
.....authority should not be arbitrary, capricious of vindictive, 5. no doubt, the revising authority in this case has not referred to any specific material which formed the basis for arriving at the figure fixed by it, but in the statement of the case submitted to this court the turnover of the assessee for the earlier year, the survey of his premises and the rejection of the explanation given by him have been mentioned. it would have been better if the judge (revisions) had disclosed the aforesaid materials in the order itself......disclosed a turnover of more than rs. 5 lacs. on the basis of these facts the judge (revisions) fixed the turnover at. rs. 6 lacs. while fixing the turnover, it appears from him order, he took these facts into consideration. it cannot be said in the circumstances that the fixation of turnover was without any material on then record. it would have been better if the judge (revisions) had disclosed the aforesaid materials in the order itself. but if those materials were on record had been considered by him, we cannot say that the fixation of the turnover was without any material on record.6. for the reasons stated above, we answer the reference in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the department. our answer is follows :-'on the facts and circumstances of the case.....
Judgment:
ORDER

D. M. Chandrashekhar, J. - The following question has been referred for opinion of this Court :

'Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, there was any material in support of the turnover assessed by the Jude (Revisions.)?'

2. It is not necessary to give the facts in detail. Suffice it so say that the assessees account books have been rejected by the Revising Authority and it has not been challenged by the assessee.

3. It has been alleged by the counsel for the assessee that the Revising Authority the turnover has been fixed without adverting to any material on record.

4. The principles governing best judgment assessment have been settled by series of decisions by the Supreme Court. In estimating the turnover in a best Judgment, an element of guess work is inevitable However, the Courts have held that in making a best judgment the assessing authority should not be arbitrary, capricious of vindictive,

5. No doubt, the Revising Authority in this case has not referred to any specific material which formed the basis for arriving at the figure fixed by it, but in the statement of the case submitted to this Court the turnover of the assessee for the earlier year, the survey of his premises and the rejection of the explanation given by him have been mentioned. Admittedly the assessee disclosed a turnover of more than Rs. 5 lacs. On the basis of these facts the Judge (Revisions) fixed the turnover at. Rs. 6 lacs. While fixing the turnover, it appears from him order, he took these facts into consideration. It cannot be said in the circumstances that the fixation of turnover was without any material on then record. It would have been better if the Judge (Revisions) had disclosed the aforesaid materials in the order itself. But if those materials were on record had been considered by him, we cannot say that the fixation of the turnover was without any material on record.

6. For the reasons stated above, we answer the reference in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the Department. Our answer is follows :-

'On the facts and circumstances of the case there was material in support of the turnover assessed by the Judge (Revisions).'

7. We, however, direct the parties to bear their own costs in this reference.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //