Skip to content


Chatterpal Vs. Gajadhar Upadhya and ors. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtAllahabad
Decided On
Judge
Reported inAIR1914All430(1); 25Ind.Cas.59
AppellantChatterpal
RespondentGajadhar Upadhya and ors.
Excerpt:
landlord and tenant - plot in abadi--tenant's user for long time--right of tenant to enclose and build upon it--consent of zemindar. - interpretation of statutes definition clause: [markandey katju & h.l. dattu, jj] meaning given to an expression in one statute cannot be applied to another statute. - 2. there was either a license to use the land on an easement enjoyed by him, if such a position were legally possible. 3. the court below was perfectly right in restraining the defendant from building on the land......the village. the defendant is a tenant occupying a house in the abadi. near his house is a plot of open land no. 17 which has been found by the court below to have been in the use of the tenant for a considerable time. the tenant now proposes to enclose the plot and construct a house on it. to this the zemindars do not consent and they have brought a suit for possession and an injunction restraining the defendant from constructing on the land. the question is whether the tenant can, as of right, build on the said land. at most the tenant has a right to use the open land for various purposes.2. there was either a license to use the land on an easement enjoyed by him, if such a position were legally possible. as a tenant he could not acquire an easement over his zemindar's land and a.....
Judgment:

Sunder Lal, J.

1. The plaintiffs in this case are the zemindars of the village. The defendant is a tenant occupying a house in the abadi. Near his house is a plot of open land No. 17 which has been found by the Court below to have been in the use of the tenant for a considerable time. The tenant now proposes to enclose the plot and construct a house on it. To this the zemindars do not consent and they have brought a suit for possession and an injunction restraining the defendant from constructing on the land. The question is whether the tenant can, as of right, build on the said land. At most the tenant has a right to use the open land for various purposes.

2. There was either a license to use the land on an easement enjoyed by him, if such a position were legally possible. As a tenant he could not acquire an easement over his zemindar's land and a licensee is not entitled to impose any additional burden or construct a building upon the land used by him without his landlord's consent.

3. The Court below was perfectly right in restraining the defendant from building on the land. The authorities cited fully bear out the position and I think the decree of the Court below is correct. I dismiss the appeal with costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //