Skip to content


Musammat Rameshra and ors. Vs. Kalpo Rai and anr. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtAllahabad
Decided On
Judge
Reported inAIR1924All538; 84Ind.Cas.84
AppellantMusammat Rameshra and ors.
RespondentKalpo Rai and anr.
Cases ReferredBrij Narain Rai v. Mangla Prasad Rai
Excerpt:
hindu law - joint family--alienation by uncle to pay father's debt, whether binding on nephew. - .....we dismiss the appeal with.....
Judgment:

1. After shearing arguments in the case and considering the recently pronounced decision of their Lordships of the Privy Council in the case of Brij Narain Rai v. Mangla Prasad Rai 77 Ind. Cas. 479 : 31 A. 176 : 6 A.L.J. 934 : 46 M.L.J. 23 : 5 P.L.T. 1 : 28 C.W.N. 253 : (1924) M.W.N. 68 : 19 L.W. 72 : 2 P.L.R. 41 : 10 O. and A.L.R. 82 : (1924) A.I.R. (P.C.) 50 : 33 M.L.T. 457 : 46 A. 95 : 26 Bom. L.R. 500 : 11 O.L.J. 107 (P.C.) Privy Council Appeal No. 51 of 1922, Allahabad Appeal No. 4 of 1920, decided on 14th November 1923] we are of opinion that this case was rightly decided by the learned Judge of this Court. There is nothing in the principles laid down by their Lordships of the Privy Council in the case above quoted to warrant the view that an uncle acting as Manager of a joint family is entitled to sell the share of his nephew in the joint family property in order to discharge a debt incurred by his own father, even though the said father be also the grandfather of the nephew whose property is alienated. On this ground we dismiss the appeal with costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //