Skip to content


Dagadu Vs. State of Maharashtra - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Case NumberCriminal Appeal No. 313 of 1974.
Judge
Reported inAIR1981SC1218; (1981)83BOMLR474; 1981CriLJ724; 1981(1)SCALE575; (1981)2SCC575; [1981]3SCR288
ActsCode of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 384 and 421; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 384; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
AppellantDagadu
RespondentState of Maharashtra
Appellant Advocate Harjinder Singh, Adv
Respondent Advocate O.P. Rana and ;R.N. Podar Advs.
Cases ReferredSita Ram and Ors. v. State of U.P.
Prior historyAppeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated July 23, 1973 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 759 of 1973--
Excerpt:
.....keeping in view parameters indicated in u.p. state road transport corporation & ors. v trilok chandra & ors. 1996(4) scc 362; 1994 air scw 1356, it would be appropriate to fix multiplier at 13 and rate of interest at 6% p.a. claims tribunal was directed to work out entitlements on said basis. - after having gone through the judgment of the sessions judge and the grounds taken by the appellant in his appeal by special leave we are satisfied that this case does raise some arguable points which merit serious consideration by the high court. we would like to point out that although under section 421 of the crpc, 1898 which is section 384 of the crpc, 1973 the high court has the undoubted power to summarily dismiss a first appeal against conviction of an accused yet in very serious cases..........kadtuji kadam and ors. v. state of maharashtra while laying down the guidelines for dismissing an appeal summarily observed as follows :the summary decision is accordingly a judicial decision which vitally affects the convicted appellant and in a fit case it is also open to challenge on appeal in this court. an order summarily dismissing an appeal by the word 'rejected', as is the case before us, though not violative of any statutory provision removes nearly every opportunity for detection of errors in the order. such an order does not speak and is inscrutable giving no indication of the reasoning underlying it. it may at times embarrass this court when the order appealed against prim a facie gives rise to arguable points which this court is required to consider without having the.....
Judgment:
ORDER

1. In this appeal by special leave the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. After having gone through the judgment of the Sessions Judge and the grounds taken by the appellant in his appeal by special leave we are satisfied that this case does raise some arguable points which merit serious consideration by the High Court. We would like to point out that although under Section 421 of the CrPC, 1898 which is Section 384 of the CrPC, 1973 the High Court has the undoubted power to summarily dismiss a first appeal against conviction of an accused yet in very serious cases like those under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, or other cases where death or life imprisonment can be awarded, the High Court should consider the appeal on merits instead of dismissing it summarily, unless the evidence is so clear and cogent, reliable and creditworthy that on the face of it no case for the barest consideration is made out. This Court in Govinda Kadtuji Kadam and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra while laying down the guidelines for dismissing an appeal summarily observed as follows :

The summary decision is accordingly a judicial decision which vitally affects the convicted appellant and in a fit case it is also open to challenge on appeal in this Court. An order summarily dismissing an appeal by the word 'rejected', as is the case before us, though not violative of any statutory provision removes nearly every opportunity for detection of errors in the order. Such an order does not speak and is inscrutable giving no indication of the reasoning underlying it. It may at times embarrass this Court when the order appealed against prim a facie gives rise to arguable points which this Court is required to consider without having the benefit of the views of the High Court on those points. In our opinion, therefore, when an appeal in the High Court raises a serious and substantial point which is prima facie arguable it is improper for that Court to dismiss it summarily without giving some indication of its view on the points raised.

To the same effect is the later decision of this Court in Sita Ram and Ors. v. State of U.P. : 1979CriLJ659 where this Court reiterated as follows :

The order summarily dismissing an appeal by the High Court by the word 'rejected' is not violative of any statutory provision. While holding that a summary rejection of the appeal by the High Court is not violative of any statutory provision, this Court pointed out that it is desirable that reasons are recorded by the High Court when prima facie arguable issues have been raised as that would enable the Supreme Court to appreciate the reasons for rejection of the appeal by the High Court.

2. We, therefore, hold that even if the High Court chooses to dismiss the appeal summarily some brief reasons should be given so as to enable this Court to judge whether or not the case requires any further examination. If no reasons are given then the task of this Court becomes onerous inasmuch as we have to perform the function of the High Court itself by reappraising the entire evidence resulting in serious harassment and expense to the accused. In these circumstances, we set aside the order of the High Court dismissing the appeal and direct the High Court to re-admit the appeal and hear it according to law within three months from today, as far as practicable. As the case is a very old one the High Court should give top priority to the case. The entire record and the paper books which have been prepared in this Court should be sent to the High Court which has only to hear the counsel for the parties and decide the case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //