Skip to content


State of Rajasthan, Jaipur Vs. Balchand Alias Baliay - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Case NumberCriminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos. 1424-1425 of 1977
Judge
Reported inAIR1977SC2447; 1978CriLJ195; (1977)4SCC308; [1978]1SCR535; 1977(9)LC650(SC); 1977()WLN495
AppellantState of Rajasthan, Jaipur
RespondentBalchand Alias Baliay
Appellant Advocate S.M. Jain, Adv.I. Makwana, Adv
Respondent Advocate D. Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., ; V.S. Dave, ; R.C. Tyagi and ;
Excerpt:
.....court, there is nothing to suggest that he has abused the trust placed in him by the court, his social circumstances also are not so unfavorable in the sense of his being a desperate character or unsocial element who is likely to betray the confidence that the court may place in him to turn up to take justice at the hands of the court he is stated to be a youngman of 27 years with a family to maintain. the circumstances and the social milieu do not militate against the petitioner being granted bail at this sage at the same time any possibility of the absconsion or evasion or other abuse can be taken care of by a direction that the petitioner will report himself before the police station at baran once every fortnight.;bail application allowed - motor vehicles act (59 of 1988)section..........court, there is nothing to suggest that he has abused the trust placed in him by the court; his social circumstances also are not so unfavourable in the sense of his being a desperate character or unsocial element who is likely to betray the confidence that the court may place in him to turn up to take justice at the hands of the court. he is stated to be a young man of 27 years with a family to maintain. the circumstances and the social milieu do not militate against the petitioner being granted bail at this stage. at the same time any possibility of the abscondence or evasion or other abuse can be taken care of by a direction that the petitioner will report himself before the notice station at baren once every fortnight.4. the petitioner will be released on bail on his entering into.....
Judgment:

V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.

1. The petitioner moves for bail having surrendered after leave was granted to the State to file an appeal against acquittal by the High Court.

2. The basic rule may perhaps be tersely put as bail, not jail, except where there are circumstances suggestive of fleeing from justice or thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of repeating offences or intimidating witnesses and the like, by the petitioner who seeks enlargement on bail from the court. We do not intend to be exhaustive but only illustrative.

3. It is true that the gravity of the offence involved is likely to induce the petitioner to avoid the course of justice and must weigh with us when considering the question of jail. So also the heinousness of the crime. Even so, the record of the petitioner in this case is that, while he has been on bail throughout in the trial court and he was released after the judgment of the High Court, there is nothing to suggest that he has abused the trust placed in him by the court; his social circumstances also are not so unfavourable in the sense of his being a desperate character or unsocial element who is likely to betray the confidence that the court may place in him to turn up to take justice at the hands of the court. He is stated to be a young man of 27 years with a family to maintain. The circumstances and the social milieu do not militate against the petitioner being granted bail at this stage. At the same time any possibility of the abscondence or evasion or other abuse can be taken care of by a direction that the petitioner will report himself before the notice station at Baren once every fortnight.

4. The petitioner will be released on bail on his entering into a bond of his own and one surety for Rs. 5,000/- to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Baren. While the system of pecuniary bail has a tradition behind it, the time has come for rethinking on the subject. It may well be that in most cases not monetary suretyship but undertaking by relations of the petitioner or organisation to which he belongs may be better and more socially relevant. Even so, in this case we stick to the practice and direct the furnishing of one surety for Rs. 5,000/-.

5. Application for intervention allowed


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //