Skip to content


Aditya Prakash Vs. Prescribed Authority and anr. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
Reported in(1982)2SCC108
AppellantAditya Prakash
RespondentPrescribed Authority and anr.
Excerpt:
- s. murtaza fazal ali, j.—  1. mr gupta, learned counsel for the appellant states that he withdraws the appeal as it has become infructuous in view of the subsequent action of the prescribed authority in issuing fresh notices to all the sons of the original appellant with respect to their lands as well as those left by the said appellant under the provisions of the u.p. imposition of ceiling on land holdings act as amended in 1973 and the matter having already become final.  2. the appeal is therefore dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Judgment:

S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, J.—

 1. Mr Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant states that he withdraws the appeal as it has become infructuous in view of the subsequent action of the Prescribed Authority in issuing fresh notices to all the sons of the original appellant with respect to their lands as well as those left by the said appellant under the provisions of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act as amended in 1973 and the matter having already become final.

 2. The appeal is therefore dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //