Skip to content


State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Acharya Shri Devendraprasadji Pande - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectTrusts and Societies
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
Reported inAIR1969SC373; 1969CriLJ649; 1969MhLJ45(SC); [1969]1SCR456
ActsBombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 37(1), 67 and 84(1)
AppellantState of Gujarat and anr.
RespondentAcharya Shri Devendraprasadji Pande
DispositionAppeal dismissed
Excerpt:
.....quite clear that the respondent was not being prosecuted for failure to obtain permission from the charity commissioner in the matter of investment of funds but the case for the prosecution as urged by the assistant government pleader before the high court, was that in the letter dated march 22, 1962, the charity commissioner had called for a 'statement' or 'report' regarding certain construction work which was being carried on by the respondent in his capacity as a trustee and since the same had not been complied with the respondent had been rightly convicted. 7. the act was enacted to regulate and to make better provisions for the administration of public, religious and charitable trusts in the state of bombay. section 89 of that act contains the penalties inter alia for refusal,..........act and the rules framed thereunder where these words had been employed or used. as regards the word 'statement' reference was made to rules 17, 22 and 23. similarly the word 'report' was mentioned in sections 34, 37 and 38. it was finally held that the charity commissioner had not called for any 'statement' or 'report' but for particulars and detailed information regarding the various items set out in his letter which he was not empowered to do.7. the act was enacted to regulate and to make better provisions for the administration of public, religious and charitable trusts in the state of bombay. section 2 (13) defines public trust. section 2 (13) defines the word 'trustee' as a person in whom either alone or in association with other persons, the trust property is vested and.....
Judgment:

A.N. Grover, J.

1. This is an appeal by certificate against the Judgment of the High Court of Gujarat setting aside an order of a Magistrate by which the respondent was convicted of an offence under Section 67 read with Section 87 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 (as adapted and applied to the State of Gujarat), hereinafter referred to as the Act, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of which he was to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

2. The respondent is one of the trustees of a trust known as 'Shri Swami Narayan Mandir' at Ahmedabad which is registered as a public trust in the office of the Charity Commissioner. The trust is managed under a scheme prepared by the High Court of Bombay. It appears that the Charity Commissioner learnt about certain constructions having been made by the respondent trustee without permission from him. On March 22, 1962 a letter (Ext. 3) was addressed from his office to the respondent the material part of which may be reproduced:

'An information is received of the Charity Commissioner that opposite the temple near the New Namarayan building the blocks are being constructed in which shops are constructed on the ground floor of that building.

1. For what purpose it is constructed?

2. From when its construction work is started?

3. What amount is spent till today in construction of the same ?

4. What amount is to be spent still ?

5. How much income will accrue from it ?

6. By which No. and on what date the permission of the Charity Commissioner is taken for constructing the same.

7. To which contractors are given the contracts for constructing the same His name, address, amount of the contract and other details and a copy of the contract.

8. If the committee has passed a resolution for constructing the same, its true copy.

9. If a contract is given to any contractor, then whether that contractor is related or acquainted to any member of the committee. All these necessary information may please be sent before 15-4-1962.'

Queries on similar lines were made regarding the constructions near the respondent's bungalow in Girdharnagar.

3. As no reply was received from the respondent reminders were sent to him on April 20, 1962 and May 10, 1962 followed by a telegram despatched on May 23, 1962. A reply was sent by the respondent giving the particulars of the buildings which had been constructed. Reference was made to the resolutions of the Committee relating to these constructions together with the amount spent on them.

4. The Inspector appointed under the Act made a report dated May 4, .1963 giving the result of the enquiry made by him relating to the aforesaid constructions. According to him 8 shops had been constructed adjoining the Namarayan building opposite the Swaminarayan temple, the estimated cost of which was more than Rs. 2 lacs. On Plot No. 98-A shops were being built in four blocks. Construction was also being made on another plot No. 98-A-2 opposite the railway crossing. On May 30, 1962 the Charity Commissioner instituted a complaint in the court of the City Magistrate at Ahmedabad giving most of these facts and stating inter alia that under the provisions of the Act a trustee who desired to invest trust funds in construction of buildings was bound to obtain permission of the Charity Commissioner which had not been done in the present case. According to him the respondent had deliberately committed a breach of the relevant provisions of the Act and had omitted to comply with the notice dated May 22, 1962. The gravamen of the charge was contained in paragraph 7 according to which the respondent had, without reasonable cause, failed to comply with the order and the directions issued to him under the provisions of Section 37 of the Act.

5. The respondent filed an application (Ext. 6) before the Magistrate submitting that the investment of the trust funds made in the construction of the building adjacent to the Narnarayan Bhavan was legal and had been done in good faith. It was for the benefit of the institution. The scheme committee had given its consent by passing resolutions. By an order dated June 10, 1963, the City Magistrate held that the respondent had not shown the purpose of the new constructions nor had he furnished the date of commencement of the work as also the details of the amount already spent and to be spent on the said constructions. He was accordingly convicted under Section 37 read with Section 67 of the Act. The respondent moved the High Court on the revisional side.

6. It was quite clear that the respondent was not being prosecuted for failure to obtain permission from the Charity Commissioner in the matter of investment of funds but the case for the prosecution as urged by the Assistant Government Pleader before the High Court, was that in the letter dated March 22, 1962, the Charity Commissioner had called for a 'statement' or 'report' regarding certain construction work which was being carried on by the respondent in his capacity as a trustee and since the same had not been complied with the respondent had been rightly convicted. The High Court was of the view that the words used in Cl. (c) of Section 37 (1) namely, return, statement, account or report have to be interpreted or construed with reference to the other provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder where these words had been employed or used. As regards the word 'statement' reference was made to Rules 17, 22 and 23. Similarly the word 'report' was mentioned in Sections 34, 37 and 38. It was finally held that the Charity Commissioner had not called for any 'statement' or 'report' but for particulars and detailed information regarding the various items set out in his letter which he was not empowered to do.

7. The Act was enacted to regulate and to make better provisions for the administration of public, religious and charitable trusts in the State of Bombay. Section 2 (13) defines public trust. Section 2 (13) defines the word 'trustee' as a person in whom either alone or in association with other persons, the trust property is vested and includes a manager. Section 2 (20) says that words and expressions used but not defined in the Indian Trusts Act. 1882 shall have the meanings assigned to them in that Act. Chapter II of the Act provides for the appointment of the Charity Commissioner, Joint Deputy and Assistant Charity Commissioners as also the subordinate officers and assessors. Chapter III gives charitable purposes and validity of certain trusts. Chapter IV relates to registration of public trusts. Under Section 17 a duty has been cast on the Deputy or Assistant Charity Commissioner in charge of the public trust registration office to keep and maintain such books, indices and other registers as may be prescribed which have to contain the prescribed particulars. Under Section 22 where any change occurs in any of the entries in the register kept under Section 17 the trustee shall, within 90 days from the date of the occurrence of such change, report the same in the prescribed form to the Deputy or Assistant Charity Commissioner in charge of the public trust registration office. Chapter V deals with accounts and audit. Section 32 makes it the duty of every trustee to keep regular accounts in the approved form containing the prescribed particulars. Under Section 34 it is the duty of every Auditor to prepare balance sheet and to report irregularities etc. Section 35 relates to investment of public trust money and provides inter alia that the Charity Commissioner may permit a trustee to invest money in any manner other than that provided in that section. Section 36 prohibits alienation of immovable property of a public trust without the previous sanction of the Charity Commissioner. Chapter VI which contains Sections 37 to 41 is headed 'control'. Section 37 gives powers of inspection and supervision to the Charity Commissioner etc. These officers have been given, under Sub-section (1), the power

(a) 'to enter on and inspect or cause to be entered on and inspected any property belonging to a public trust;

(b) to call for or inspect any extract from any proceedings of the trustees of any public trust and any books of account or documents in the possession, or under the control, of the trustees or any person on behalf of the trustees.;

(c) to call for any return, statement, account or report which he may think fit from the trustees or any person connected with a public trust'.

Sub-section (2) says that it shall be the duty of every trustee to afford all reasonable facilities to any officer exercising any of the powers under Sub-section (1) and to comply with any order or direction made by him. Sections 38 and 39 provide for calling of an explanation from the trustee or any other person concerned on the report of the Auditor and the making of a report by the Deputy or the Assistant Charity Commissioner to the Charity Commissioner about the gross negligence, breach of trust etc. of the trustee. Under Section 40 the Charity Commissioner after considering the report submitted under Section 39 and giving an opportunity to the person concerned and holding such enquiry as he thinks fit can determine the various matters set out in that section and under Section 41 if he decides that any person is liable to pay to the public trust any amount for the loss caused to the trust he may direct that that amount shall be surcharged on that person. Section 54 provides for what is called Dharmada and an account is to be submitted in the prescribed form. Section 56 (N) (2) (h) includes among the general duties of a Committee in which the management of certain endowments vests under Section 56 (D) to supply such returns, statistics, accounts and other information with respect to such endowments as the State Government may, from time to time, require. It is unnecessary to notice the other sections with the exception of Sections 67 and 69. Section 67 provides for contravention inter alia of any order or direction made under the Act by the Charity Commissioner. Section 69 relates to the duties, functions and powers of the Charity Commissioner. Under Cl. (h) he can enter on and inspect any trust property and call for and inspect any proceedings of a trust. He can further call for any returns, statement, books of account document or report from trustees or any person connected with a public trust under Section 37.

8. The relevant rules in the Bombay Public Trust (Gujarat Rules 1961) may next be examined. Rule 17 is to the effect that every trustee shall keep regular accounts of all receipts and of moveable and immovable property and of all encumbrances created on the trust property and of all payments, alienations etc. made on behalf of the trust. The accounts have to contain all such particulars as in the opinion of the Charity Commissioner will facilitate preparation of the balance sheet and income and expenditure account in the Form of Schedules VIII and IX and the preparation of a statement of income chargeable to contributions in the Form of Schedule IXC. According to the proviso to Rule 17 where the trustees of a public trust are entitled to file statements in the Form of Schedules IXA and IX-B by virtue of any exemption granted under Section 83 (4) (b) the accounts may contain particulars which shall facilitate the preparation of statements in the aforesaid Form of Schedules IX-A and IXB. Schedule IXC is headed 'statement of income liable to contributions' and has reference to Sub-rule (3) of Rule 32 which provides for contributions to the Public Trust Administration Fund by every public trust other than a trust exclusively for the purpose of advancement and propagation of secular education or exclusively for the purpose of medical relief or veterinary treatment of animals; certain deductions specified therein shall be allowed in calculating the gross annual income of a public trust or where the public trust is a Dharmada, its gross annual collection by receipts for the purpose of assessing the contribution. Schedules IXA and IXB are headed 'statements of income and expenditure' respectively and have as stated before reference to Section 33 (4) (b) which provides that the Government may, by general or special order, exempt any public trust or class of public trusts from the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 33 according to which the accounts shall be audited annually in such manner as may be prescribed and by a person who is a Chartered Accountant or by such persons as may be authorised by the State Government. Rule 18 which relates to the powers in respect of audit empowers the Deputy or the Assistant Charity Commissioner inter alia to require the production before the auditor of any book, deed, account etc. by the trustee or to give such information as may be necessary regarding the same. Rules 22 and 23 provide for inspection and grant of entries in the public trust register and other documents. Thus inspection and grant of copies can be obtained of any entry or portion thereof in the register of public trust or any statement, notice intimation, account, audit report or any other document filed under the Act.

9. In other similar legislation on public trusts the expressions which have been used may be noticed. In the (English) Charitable Trusts Act 1853 it was provided by Section 10 that the Board (consisting of the Charity Commissioner) may require all trustees or persons acting or having any concern in the management or administration of any charity or the estate, funds or property thereof to render to the said Board accounts and statements in writing in relation to such charity or the funds, estate, property, income or monies thereof or may also require such trustee to return answers in writing to any questions or enquiries addressed to them by the Board relating to the aforesaid matters. Under Section 14 if any person from whom the Board required any account or statement or answers to any question or enquiry etc. refused or wilfully neglected to render to the Board such account or statement or to make answers to questions or enquiries he was to be guilty of contempt of court and was liable to be committed therefor. The Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act 1939 contains mention of account, report or returns. Under Section 29 (1) (a) the Commissioner is empowered to suspend, remove or dismiss a trustee for persistent default in submission of the same. The Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act 1951 was enacted for amending and consolidating the law relating to the administration and governance of Hindu Religious and Charitable Institutions and Endowments in the State of Madras. Section 27 provides that the trustee of every religious institution shall furnish to the Commissioner such accounts, returns, reports or other information relating to the administration of the institution etc. as the commissioner may require. Section 89 of that Act contains the penalties inter alia for refusal, neglect or failure to furnish such accounts, returns or reports or other information relating to the administration of the trust or its funds.

10. In the present case in the High Court it was argued on behalf of the State that the enquiries which were made by means of the letter in question would fall within the meaning of either 'statement' or 'report'. Counsel before us has not been able to show how any of the enquiries made would be covered by the word 'report' particularly with reference to the sections in which it appears. It is abundantly clear from the context in which this word has been used in Section 37 (1) (c) that it can have reference only to a formal report or some such report as the trustee may be required to make under the provisions of the Act or the rules, if any, framed under Section 84(l)(b) which reads 'form in which the trustee has to make a report regarding the change under Section 22'. Similarly the word 'statement' has been employed in a number of provisions of the Act and the rules which have been referred to in detail and it would seem that this word appearing in Section 37 (1) (c) has to be construed with reference to them. It is difficult to impute to the legislature the intention of using the word 'statement' in its widest connotation so as to take in the answering of all enquiries and giving of all kinds of information. It is significant that in Section 37 (1) (c) the words 'other information' are not to be found in the same way as they are to be found in Section 27 of the Madras Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Act 1951. It is also noteworthy that the language analogous to that employed in the English Charitable Trusts Act in Sections 10 and 12 has not been employed in Section 37 (1) (c) of the Act. There, in Section 10, the words used are 'accounts and statements' and in Section 14 'accounts or statement' but in addition answers have to be returned to any questions or enquiries and the refusal to do so is punishable with contempt of court. In the Act itself the legislature was fully aware of the true import of the word 'information' as is clear from Section 56 (2) (h) and Rule 18. It is difficult, therefore, to equate the word 'statement' as used in Section 37 (1) (c) with the word 'information' or answering of enquiries etc. which would have a much wider sweep than the word 'statement' when considered from the point of view of statutory provisions and the rules in which it appears.

11. In view of the above discussion it is difficult to hold that any of the items mentioned in the letter dated March 22, 1962 fall within the meaning of the words 'report' or 'statement'. The enquiries which have been made can only involve the calling of information on various matters mentioned in the letter which could hardly be said to fall within the aforesaid expressions used in Section 37 (1) (c).

12. The view of the High Court, therefore, must be upheld, with the result that the appeal fails and is dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //