Skip to content


The United Commercial Bank and Anr. Vs. Gangadhar Mohanty and Anr. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
AppellantThe United Commercial Bank and Anr.
RespondentGangadhar Mohanty and Anr.
Excerpt:
non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.10948 of2016(arising out of slp ( c) no.22869 of 2014) the united commercial bank & anr. appellants versus gangadhar mohanty & anr. respondents judgment kurian,j.1 leave granted. 2 the appellant-bank approached this court aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17.07.2014 which reads as follows : “this court directs the zonal manager, uco bank to file an affidavit to the effect that in no case compromise has been done where the value of the property is more than the value of outstanding amount. list this matter next week.” 3 heard the learned counsel for the appellants and respondents. the parties have fairly submitted that the matter can go back to the high court without insisting for the.....
Judgment:

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10948 OF2016(Arising out of SLP ( C) No.22869 of 2014) THE UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS GANGADHAR MOHANTY & ANR. RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT

KURIAN,J.

1 Leave granted. 2 The appellant-Bank approached this Court aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17.07.2014 which reads as follows : “This Court directs the Zonal manager, UCO bank to file an affidavit to the effect that in no case compromise has been done where the value of the property is more than the value of outstanding amount. List this matter next week.” 3 Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and respondents. The parties have fairly submitted that the matter can go back to the High Court without insisting for the affidavit. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we set aside the order as extracted above and remit the matter to the - 2 - High Court. The High Court is requested to dispose of the writ petition on or before 31.03.2017.

4. In view of the above observations, the appeal is disposed of. No costs. .................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. ....................J.

[ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]. NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER18 2016


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //