Skip to content


Prem Chand Sharma Vs. Shiv Prasad and Anr. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
AppellantPrem Chand Sharma
RespondentShiv Prasad and Anr.
Excerpt:
.....disputes between two real brothers, a suggestion was made by the court that the possibility of an amicable settlement of the disputes could be explored between the parties. 3 it is heartening to note that in the process the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the supreme court mediation centre and the settlement agreement dated 12.05.2016 has also been drawn up. the parties, their counsel and shri k.d.singh, learned mediator, supreme court of india have duly signed the deed. we record our appreciation for the efforts taken by the mediator and for the cooperation given by the parties and their learned counsel.-. 2 - 4 the appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 12.05.2016. 5 in that view of the matter, nothing survives in first appeal no.62 of.....
Judgment:

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10432 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.4254 of 2016) PREM CHAND SHARMA APPELLANT VERSUS SHIV PRASAD AND ANR. RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1 Leave granted.

2. At the time of issuing notice in the matter, having regard to the nature of disputes between two real brothers, a suggestion was made by the Court that the possibility of an amicable settlement of the disputes could be explored between the parties. 3 It is heartening to note that in the process the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre and the Settlement Agreement dated 12.05.2016 has also been drawn up. The parties, their counsel and Shri K.D.Singh, learned Mediator, Supreme Court of India have duly signed the deed. We record our appreciation for the efforts taken by the Mediator and for the cooperation given by the parties and their learned counsel.-. 2 - 4 The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 12.05.2016. 5 In that view of the matter, nothing survives in First Appeal No.62 of 2012 pending before the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital and hence the same is also disposed of. Registry to communicate a copy of this Judgment to the High Court. ...................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. ....................J.

[ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]. NEW DELHI; OCTOBER28 2016


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //