Skip to content


Subrahmania Pillai Vs. Muthukutti - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtChennai
Decided On
Reported in(1898)8MLJ84
AppellantSubrahmania Pillai
RespondentMuthukutti
Cases Referred(Bhomshetti v. Umabai
Excerpt:
- 1. we do not think that the service in this case was proper. mere temporary absence of the person to be served does not justify the process-server affixing the summons to the door. (bhomshetti v. umabai, i.l.r. 21 b. 223 it is the duty of the peon to take some pains to find out the person to be served, so that, if possible, personal service may be effected.2. we must set aside the decree and direct that the subordinate judge do restore the suit to his file and dispose of it according to law.3. costs will abide and follow the result.
Judgment:

1. We do not think that the service in this case was proper. Mere temporary absence of the person to be served does not justify the process-server affixing the summons to the door. (Bhomshetti v. Umabai, I.L.R. 21 B. 223 It is the duty of the peon to take some pains to find out the person to be served, so that, if possible, personal service may be effected.

2. We must set aside the decree and direct that the Subordinate Judge do restore the suit to his file and dispose of it according to law.

3. Costs will abide and follow the result.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //