Skip to content


Respublica Vs. Caldwell - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number1 U.S. 150
AppellantRespublica
RespondentCaldwell
Excerpt:
respublica v. caldwell - 1 u.s. 150 (1785) u.s. supreme court respublica v. caldwell, 1 u.s. 150 (1785) 1 u.s. 150 (dall.) respublica v. caldwell court of oyer and terminer, at philadelphia. september sessions, 1785 this was an indictment for a nuisance, in erecting a wharf on the public property. the defendant offered witnesses to prove that the erection of the wharf has been beneficial to the public, and, therefore, not to be regarded as a nuisance. but m'kean, chief justice, delivered the opinion of the court, that the evidence was inadmissible, for two reasons: first, because it would only amount to matter of opinion, whereas it is on facts the court must proceed; and the necessary facts are already in proof. secondly; because it would.....
Judgment:
RESPUBLICA v. CALDWELL - 1 U.S. 150 (1785)
U.S. Supreme Court RESPUBLICA v. CALDWELL, 1 U.S. 150 (1785)

1 U.S. 150 (Dall.)

Respublica
v.
Caldwell

Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia.

September Sessions, 1785

This was an indictment for a Nuisance, in erecting a wharf on the public property. The defendant offered witnesses to prove that the erection of the wharf has been beneficial to the public, and, therefore, not to be regarded as a Nuisance.

But M'Kean, Chief Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, that the evidence was inadmissible, for two reasons: First, Because it would only amount to matter of opinion, whereas it is on facts the Court must proceed; and the necessary facts are already in proof. Secondly; Because it would be no justification; for, on the same principle that the defendant might carry his wharf 12 feet, he could justify extending it farther; or any other man might excuse a similar intrusion. Suppose, for instance, a street were 60 feet wide, 12 feet might be taken off it, without doing any material injury to the public property, or creating any great obstruction to passengers; yet, surely this will not justify any man's actually building upon, and assuming the property of the 12 feet that could be thus spared.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //