Skip to content


Respublica Vs. Coates - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number2 U.S. 109
AppellantRespublica
RespondentCoates
Excerpt:
respublica v. coates - 2 u.s. 109 (1790) u.s. supreme court respublica v. coates, 2 u.s. 109 (1790) 2 u.s. 109 (dall.) respublica v. coates supreme court of pennsylvania june term, 1790 this was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant's counsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the attorney general, page 2 u.s. 109, 110 approved by the court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the court said, they would order the jury to be qualified. levy for the plaintiff; serjeant for the defendant.
Judgment:
RESPUBLICA v. COATES - 2 U.S. 109 (1790)
U.S. Supreme Court RESPUBLICA v. COATES, 2 U.S. 109 (1790)

2 U.S. 109 (Dall.)

Respublica
v.
Coates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

June Term, 1790

This was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant's counsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the Attorney General,

Page 2 U.S. 109, 110

approved by the Court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the Court said, they would order the jury to be qualified.

Levy for the plaintiff; Serjeant for the defendant.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //