Skip to content


Shaw Vs. Wallace - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number2 U.S. 179
AppellantShaw
RespondentWallace
Excerpt:
shaw v. wallace - 2 u.s. 179 (1792) u.s. supreme court shaw v. wallace, 2 u.s. 179 (1792) 2 u.s. 179 (dall.) shaw v. wallace supreme court of pennsylvania september term, 1792 this cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. the defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff page 2 u.s. 179, 180 residing in new york. moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial. but, by the court: it is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial. rule granted.
Judgment:
SHAW v. WALLACE - 2 U.S. 179 (1792)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAW v. WALLACE, 2 U.S. 179 (1792)

2 U.S. 179 (Dall.)

Shaw
v.
Wallace

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1792

This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff

Page 2 U.S. 179, 180

residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.

But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.

Rule granted.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //