Skip to content


Brudenell Et Al Vs. Vaux - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number2 U.S. 302
AppellantBrudenell Et Al
RespondentVaux
Excerpt:
brudenell et al v. vaux - 2 u.s. 302 (1794) u.s. supreme court brudenell et al v. vaux, 2 u.s. 302 (1794) 2 u.s. 302 (f.cas.) 2 dall. 302 brudenell et al. v. vaux et. al. circuit court, pennsylvania district april term, 1794 the question in this cause arose upon the act of assembly for recording mortgages (1 vol. dall. edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six lunar, but within six calendar, months, from the date: and the court, having compared this, with other acts of the legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' calendar months were intended. lewis & tilghman, for the plaintiff. ingersoll, rawle, & thomas, for the defendant.
Judgment:
BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX - 2 U.S. 302 (1794)
U.S. Supreme Court BRUDENELL ET AL v. VAUX, 2 U.S. 302 (1794)

2 U.S. 302 (F.Cas.) 2 Dall. 302

Brudenell et al.
v.
Vaux et. al.

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District

April Term, 1794

The question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And the Court, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word 'months,' Calendar months were intended.

Lewis & Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //