Skip to content


Raman Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtChennai
Decided On
Judge
Reported in(1901)ILR24Mad427
AppellantRaman
RespondentSecretary of State for India in Council
Excerpt:
suits valuation act - act vii of 1887, section 11--improper valuation for jurisdictional purposes--case not finally disposed of by lower appellate court but only remanded for findings--validity of order of remand. - - in a case like this the effect of section 11 of the suits valuation act is to cure the want of jurisdiction unless the appellate court is satisfied that the undervaluation has prejudicially affected the cause on the merits......anything done in pursuance of that order must be treated as a nullity. the objection is based on undervaluation. in a case like this the effect of section 11 of the suits valuation act is to cure the want of jurisdiction unless the appellate court is satisfied that the undervaluation has prejudicially affected the cause on the merits. if the lower appellate court had finally disposed of the appeal on the merits, it might be said that the party against whom the decision went had been prejudicially affected, but there has been no disposal on the merits, and it is open to this court to deal with the findings and go into the question of their correctness. we are unable to accept the respondent's suggestion that section 11 of the suits valuation act only applies when there is a final.....
Judgment:

1. It has been objected on behalf of the respondent) that the order of lower Appellate Court remitting the case to the Court of First Instance for a finding on the issue as to title Was made without jurisdiction and that anything done in pursuance of that order must be treated as a nullity. The objection is based on undervaluation. In a case like this the effect of Section 11 of the Suits Valuation Act is to cure the want of jurisdiction unless the Appellate Court is satisfied that the undervaluation has prejudicially affected the cause on the merits. If the lower Appellate Court had finally disposed of the appeal on the merits, it might be said that the party against whom the decision went had been prejudicially affected, but there has been no disposal on the merits, and it is open to this Court to deal with the findings and go into the question of their correctness. We are unable to accept the respondent's suggestion that Section 11 of the Suits Valuation Act only applies when there is a final disposal by the lower Appellate Court. The objection must be overruled


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //