Skip to content


Clarke Vs. Bazadone - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number5 U.S. 212
AppellantClarke
RespondentBazadone
Excerpt:
clarke v. bazadone - 5 u.s. 212 (1803) u.s. supreme court clarke v. bazadone, 5 u.s. 1 cranch 212 212 (1803) clarke v. bazadone 5 u.s. (1 cranch) 212 error to the general court of the territory northwest of the river ohio syllabus a writ of error does not lie from this court to the general court of the territory northwest of the ohio. this court was established by an ordinance of the colonial congress, during the confederation. the only question decided in the case was whether the writ of error would lie. the writ of error was quashed on the ground that the act of congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error to the supreme court of the united states.
Judgment:
Clarke v. Bazadone - 5 U.S. 212 (1803)
U.S. Supreme Court Clarke v. Bazadone, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 212 212 (1803)

Clarke v. Bazadone

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 212

ERROR TO THE GENERAL COURT OF THE

TERRITORY NORTHWEST OF THE RIVER OHIO

Syllabus

A writ of error does not lie from this Court to the general court of the territory northwest of the Ohio.

This Court was established by an ordinance of the colonial Congress, during the confederation. The only question decided in the case was whether the writ of error would lie.

The writ of error was quashed on the ground that the act of Congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //