Skip to content


Cartwright Vs. Howe - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number42 U.S. 188
AppellantCartwright
RespondentHowe
Excerpt:
.....term, 1843 this cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the circuit court of the united states for the district of columbia, holden in and for the county of washington, and it having been stated by mr. bradley, of counsel for the defendant in error, that the matters in controversy had been agreed and settled between the parties, to which mr. r. j. brent, of counsel for the plaintiff in error, assented; it is thereupon now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed, with costs.
Judgment:
CARTWRIGHT v. HOWE - 42 U.S. 188 (1843)
U.S. Supreme Court CARTWRIGHT v. HOWE, 42 U.S. 188 (1843)

42 U.S. 188 (How.)

ELIZABETH R. CARTWRIGHT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ALEXANDER T. HOWE, GEORGE F. RICHARDS, AND WILLIAM RICHARDS, DEFENDANTS.

January Term, 1843

THIS cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, holden in and for the county of Washington, and it having been stated by Mr. Bradley, of counsel for the defendant in error, that the matters in controversy had been agreed and settled between the parties, to which Mr. R. J. Brent, of counsel for the plaintiff in error, assented; it is thereupon now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed, with costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //