1. This is a revision petition against an order under Section 73, Civil P. C. It may be that, if the order of the Court is obviously wrong and if one can say that the proper order should be in favour of the petitioner, we may interfere in civil revision petition: vide Sree Krishna Das v. Chandook Chand  32 Mad. 334 But the matter here is not obvious. The question turns on the meaning of the words 'receipt of assets' in a case where the decree-holder has been allowed to bid and set off. The petitioner relies on Arunachalam Chetty v. Somasundaram Chetty  12 M .L. W. 328.
2. In these circumstances we think we ought not to decide the matter in revision. The petitioner has got another remedy by a regular suit.
3. The petition is dismissed, but under the circumstances of the case, without costs.