Skip to content


Field Vs. Seabury - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number60 U.S. 333
AppellantField
RespondentSeabury
Excerpt:
field v. seabury - 60 u.s. 333 (1856) u.s. supreme court field v. seabury, 60 u.s. 333 (1856) 60 u.s. 333 (how.) edward field, plaintiff in error, v. pardon g. seabury et al. december term, 1856 this, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the circuit court of the united states for the district of california. it was argued in connection with the preceding case. mr. justice wayne delivered the opinion of the court. page 60 u.s. 333, 334 this case was like the preceding, and they were argued together. for the reasons given in the first of them, the court directs the reversal of the judgment in the court below, in this case.
Judgment:
FIELD v. SEABURY - 60 U.S. 333 (1856)
U.S. Supreme Court FIELD v. SEABURY, 60 U.S. 333 (1856)

60 U.S. 333 (How.)

EDWARD FIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PARDON G. SEABURY ET AL.

December Term, 1856

THIS, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of California. It was argued in connection with the preceding case.

Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

Page 60 U.S. 333, 334

This case was like the preceding, and they were argued together.

For the reasons given in the first of them, the court directs the reversal of the judgment in the court below, in this case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //