Skip to content


In Re: Donepudi Rangayya and anr. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtChennai
Decided On
Reported inAIR1927Mad1111
AppellantIn Re: Donepudi Rangayya and anr.
Cases ReferredKristnamma Naidu v. Chapa Naidu
Excerpt:
- curgenven, j.1. the petitioners' vakil wished me to go into the merits of the appellate court's order of remand, but does not show me that it had no jurisdiction to pass such an order. this is a line of attack which is not admissible in applying for revision under section 115, civil p. c. nor can i find that, having regard to the full bench case in kristnamma naidu v. chapa naidu [1894] 17 mad. 410 (f. b.) the learned subordinate judge acted with material irregularity. the petition is dismissed.
Judgment:

Curgenven, J.

1. The petitioners' vakil wished me to go into the merits of the appellate Court's order of remand, but does not show me that it had no jurisdiction to pass such an order. This is a line of attack which is not admissible in applying for revision under Section 115, Civil P. C. Nor can I find that, having regard to the Full Bench case in Kristnamma Naidu v. Chapa Naidu [1894] 17 Mad. 410 (F. B.) the learned Subordinate Judge acted with material irregularity. The petition is dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //