Skip to content


Sheku Sahib Vs. Venkatararamanayya - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
Subjectcriminal
CourtChennai
Decided On
Reported inAIR1941Mad799
AppellantSheku Sahib
RespondentVenkatararamanayya
Excerpt:
- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the property was attached by the amin in execution of a decree at the instance of the petitioner and the fact that the claim petition of the complainant was allowed does not warrant the conviction of the petitioner under section 879 read with section 114, penal code. the conviction is therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.
Judgment:
ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The property was attached by the amin in execution of a decree at the instance of the petitioner and the fact that the claim petition of the complainant was allowed does not warrant the conviction of the petitioner under Section 879 read with Section 114, Penal Code. The conviction is therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //