Skip to content


Secretary of State Vs. Muthu Alagappa Chettiar - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtChennai
Decided On
Reported inAIR1928Mad1093
AppellantSecretary of State
RespondentMuthu Alagappa Chettiar
Excerpt:
- devadoss, j.1. this is an application by the government pleader for revising the order of the district munsif of tiruvalur ordering inspection of certain documents in the possession of the collector of tanjore. the main point urged before me by mr. venkataramana rao is that these documents are confidential communications and therefore the respondent is not entitled to look into them. this objection was not raised in the lower court and the order made by the district munsif, which is objected to, cannot be said to have been made without jurisdiction and i therefore decline to interfere with it. but in dismissing this petition i might observe that i strongly deprecate the conducting of correspondence by the collector and the district judge in their official capacity with reference to the.....
Judgment:

Devadoss, J.

1. This is an application by the Government Pleader for revising the order of the District Munsif of Tiruvalur ordering inspection of certain documents in the possession of the Collector of Tanjore. The main point urged before me by Mr. Venkataramana Rao is that these documents are confidential communications and therefore the respondent is not entitled to look into them. This objection was not raised in the lower Court and the order made by the District Munsif, which is objected to, cannot be said to have been made without jurisdiction and I therefore decline to interfere with it. But in dismissing this petition I might observe that I strongly deprecate the conducting of correspondence by the Collector and the District Judge in their official capacity with reference to the production of these documents. It is to be regretted that acting upon a letter of the District Collector of Tanjore, the District Judge passed proceedings which are printed at p. 17. The District Judge is entitled to give general direction to the District Munsifs and Subordinate Judges, but it is not proper for the District Judge to pass any proceedings with reference to pending matters which might fetter the judicial discretion of any of his subordinate officers. The District Munsif will not permit a roving commission into the registers mentioned in the plaintiff's application but will restrict the inspection to only such of the documents as the plaintiff names and which might refer to his case or help him in his case. No party is entitled to have a roving commission into papers belonging to the other side, whether the other side is the Government or a private party.

2. Mr. Venkataramana Rao is afraid that this order might prevent him from raising the question of privilege before the District Munsifs Court. I see no reason why, if properly advised, the Government Pleader in the lower Court could not raise this objection. With these remarks I dismiss this civil revision petition with costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //