Skip to content


Nageshwar Prosad Singh Vs. Rudra Prokash Singh - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtKolkata
Decided On
Judge
Reported in(1904)ILR31Cal210
AppellantNageshwar Prosad Singh
RespondentRudra Prokash Singh
Excerpt:
lunatic - lunacy act (xxxv of 1858) section 23--adjudication of lunacy upon evidence--admission by the alleged lunatic. - .....in their order of propinquity to take charge of the property. it will be first offered to ajodhya prosad singh, who is the nearest relative admitted by both sides who has refer yet been objected to.' it appears dearly from the proceedings on the record and also from what has been stated by the judge himself on the 18th january 1902, that nageshwar prosad singh, has never yet been adjudged a lunatic, under section 7 of act xxxv of 1858, it is necessary for the court to adjudge a person to be a lunatic within the meaning of section 23 of that act, before an order can be passed as to the management of his property and for the guardianship of his person. in the present case, such an adjudication, has not been come to. we must, therefore, set aside the order of the lower court and send back.....
Judgment:

Ghose and Pratt, JJ.

1. The short point which arises in this appeal is whether the District Judge was justified in passing various orders which culminated in the deal order of the 11th. October 1901 and which is in these terms: 'The nearest relatives on the lists filed will be requested in their order of propinquity to take charge of the property. It will be first offered to Ajodhya Prosad Singh, who is the nearest relative admitted by both sides who has refer yet been objected to.' It appears dearly from the proceedings on the record and also from what has been stated by the Judge himself on the 18th January 1902, that Nageshwar Prosad Singh, has never yet been adjudged a lunatic, under Section 7 of Act XXXV of 1858, It is necessary for the Court to adjudge a person to be a lunatic within the meaning of Section 23 of that Act, before an order can be passed as to the management of his property and for the guardianship of his person. In the present case, such an adjudication, has not been come to. We must, therefore, set aside the order of the lower Court and send back the case to the District Judge for disposal according to law. It is clear that the learned Judge cannot proceed upon an admission made by a person who is supposed to be a lunatic, though he would be justified in examining him personally. He must come to a decision upon evidence. Under the circumstances of the case, we direct that Ajodhya Prosad Singh do receive his costs from the appellant. We assess the hearing, fee at one gold mohur. We make no order as regards the costs of the other parties.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //