1. We do not propose to call upon the respondents, and we do not think that this is a case in which it is necessary to put the parties to the inconvenience of awaiting a written judgment.
2. It is not necessary for us to attempt any narrative of the circumstances of the case which are somewhat complicated in their detail. Those circumstances are fully set out in the judgment of the learned Judge, and we have only to deal with four points which arise upon the statements of the learned pleader for the appellant before us, and what we say will arise from the facts stated in the judgment of the learned Judge.
3. The points with reference to Chandpara are twofold : As to one, it is said that the defendants Nos. 2 and 3 have not got as against the plaintiff a good title to the share held as a Hindu widow by Satanmani, inasmuch as under Section 54 of Act XI of 1859 no more than the right possessed by her passed to the purchaser, and that her right consisted only of that Hindu widow's estate which of coarse ended with her life; and that contention is founded upon these words in Section 53: 'The purchaser shall acquire the share or shares subject to all encumbrances, and shall not acquire any rights which wore not possessed by the previous owner or owners.' It is contended that here the previous owner having been a Hindu widow the purchaser did not purchase any estate which lasted longer than her life-time.
4. We do not think that that is the meaning to be attributed to this section. The Kale in question took place under the provisions of Section 13, which is applicable to sales of separate shares in respect of which separate accounts have been kept. Section 13 provides that in such cases the Collector shall put up for sale 'only that share or those shares of the estate from which, according to the separate accounts, an arrear of revenue may be due'; and the final sentence of Section 13 contains the words: 'The share or shares sold, together with the share or shares excluded from the sale, shall continue to constitute one integral estate, the share or shares sold being charged with the separate portion or the aggregate of the several separate portions of jamma assigned thereto.' We think that that passage in Section 13 throws sufficient light upon anything that is doubtful, if there be anything doubtful, in Section 54. It is plain that as the result of a sale under Section 13 it is contemplated that the whole share in respect of which the arrear may have been due shall pass to the purchaser; and that confirms the impression which, upon reading Section 54 alone, one would be disposed to form with regard to its meaning that the words 'shall not acquire any rights,' in that section refer to the acquisition of rights in respect of interest, such as encumbrances or the like, which are referred to in the previous phrase of that section. We therefore are of opinion that the entire share passed upon the sale for arrears of revenue under Section 54, and that the purchaser did not take any interest limited to the life of Satanmani.
5. [The remainder of the judgment proceeded on points not material to this report.]