Dhiku and anr. Vs. Deno Nath Deb Alias Dinu and anr. - Court Judgment
|Judge||Wilson and ;Tottenham, JJ.|
|Appellant||Dhiku and anr.|
|Respondent||Deno Nath Deb Alias Dinu and anr.|
|Cases Referred||Empress v. Raja Lakshma|
appeal in criminal case - cattle trespass act (i of 1871), section 22--illegal seizure of cattle. - wilson, j.1. we think that the ruling of the high court of bombay in queen-empress v. raja lakshma 10 b. 230, to which the sessions judge refers, is one that should be followed, and that no appeal lay to the deputy commissioner. we set aside his order and direct that the order of the first court be restored.
1. We think that the ruling of the High Court of Bombay in Queen-Empress v. Raja Lakshma 10 B. 230, to which the Sessions Judge refers, is one that should be followed, and that no appeal lay to the Deputy Commissioner. We set aside his order and direct that the order of the first Court be restored.