Skip to content


La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance Vs. Hall - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number137 U.S. 61
AppellantLa Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance
RespondentHall
Excerpt:
la confiance compagnie anonyme d'assurance v. hall - 137 u.s. 61 (1890) u.s. supreme court la confiance compagnie anonyme d'assurance v. hall, 137 u.s. 61 (1890) la confiance compagnie anonyme d'assurance v. hall no. 11 argued and submitted october 21, 1890 decided november 3, 1890 137 u.s. 61 error to the circuit court of the united states for the eastern district of missouri syllabus in a petition for the removal of a cause from a state court on the ground of diverse citizenship, the failure to state the existence of such citizenship at the commencement of the suit as well as when the removal was asked is a fatal defect. the case is stated in the opinion. page 137 u. s. 62 mr. chief justice fuller.....
Judgment:
La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall - 137 U.S. 61 (1890)
U.S. Supreme Court La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall, 137 U.S. 61 (1890)

La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall

No. 11

Argued and submitted October 21, 1890

Decided November 3, 1890

137 U.S. 61

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Syllabus

In a petition for the removal of a cause from a state court on the ground of diverse citizenship, the failure to state the existence of such citizenship at the commencement of the suit as well as when the removal was asked is a fatal defect.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 137 U. S. 62

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action was commenced by plaintiff in error in a state court, and removed to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri upon petition of the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff was an alien and citizen of France, and the defendant a citizen of Missouri. The existence of such diverse citizenship at the commencement of the suit, as well as when the removal was asked, did not appear affirmatively in the petition for removal or in the record when that was filed. We are compelled to reverse the judgment, with costs, and remit the cause to the circuit court with a direction to remand to the state court. Stevens v. Nichols, 130 U. S. 230 ; Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co., 131 U. S. 240 ; Jackson v. Allen, 132 U. S. 27 .

Ordered accordingly.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //