Ramanund Mahton Vs. Koylash Mahton - Court Judgment
|Judge||Field and ;Beverley, JJ.|
district magistrate's office - deputy magistrate placed in charge of current duties of district magistrate's office--jurisdiction--criminal procedure code--act x of 1882, section 437, penal code, act xlv of 1860, sections 379 and 417--summary trial--splitting of charges for purpose of jurisdiction. - orderfield and beverley, jj.1. for the reasons set out by the sessions judge, we reverse the conviction of koylash mahton, and direct that the fine, if realized, be refunded,2. a deputy magistrate placed in charge of the current duties of the district magistrate's office is not thereby vested with jurisdiction under section 437 of the code of criminal procedure.
Field and Beverley, JJ.
1. For the reasons set out by the Sessions Judge, we reverse the conviction of Koylash Mahton, and direct that the fine, if realized, be refunded,
2. A Deputy Magistrate placed in charge of the current duties of the District Magistrate's office is not thereby vested with jurisdiction under Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.