Skip to content


Stevenson Vs. Barbour - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number140 U.S. 48
AppellantStevenson
RespondentBarbour
Excerpt:
stevenson v. barbour - 140 u.s. 48 (1891) u.s. supreme court stevenson v. barbour, 140 u.s. 48 (1891) 140 u.s. 48 stevenson v. barbour. april 20, 1891 j. g. carlisle, for plaintiff in error. o. b. hallam, for defendantin error. fuller, c. m. no assignment of errors accompanies the transcript of record in this case, nor is there any specification of the errors relied on in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error. moreover, the record presents no question of law calling for the exercise of our right of review. fishburn v. railway co., 137 u.s. 60 , ante, 8; express co. v. malin, 132 u.s. 531, 538 , 10 s. sup. ct. rep. 166. the judgment is affirmed.[ stevenson v. barbour 140 u.s. 48 (1891) ]
Judgment:
STEVENSON v. BARBOUR - 140 U.S. 48 (1891)
U.S. Supreme Court STEVENSON v. BARBOUR, 140 U.S. 48 (1891)

140 U.S. 48

STEVENSON
v.
BARBOUR.

April 20, 1891

J. G. Carlisle, for plaintiff in error.

O. B. Hallam, for defendantin error.

FULLER, C. M.

No assignment of errors accompanies the transcript of record in this case, nor is there any specification of the errors relied on in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error. Moreover, the record presents no question of law calling for the exercise of our right of review. Fishburn v. Railway Co., 137 U.S. 60 , ante, 8; Express Co. v. Malin, 132 U.S. 531, 538 , 10 S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 166. The judgment is affirmed.[ Stevenson v. Barbour 140 U.S. 48 (1891) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //