Skip to content


Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri and Pac. R. Co. Vs. Harris - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number144 U.S. 210
AppellantMissouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri and Pac. R. Co.
RespondentHarris
Excerpt:
.....contract sued on. mandamus to compel the performance of an alleged subscription by sullivan county, missouri, to stock of a railroad company. the defense was that no valid subscription had been made under the constitution and laws of missouri. the supreme court of the state, in rendering the judgment to which this writ of error was sued out, said, in its opinion: "the power of the county court to subscribe to the stock of a railroad company was made by the constitution of 1865 and gen.stat., 1865, p. 338, § 17, to depend upon the fact that two-thirds of the qualified voters of the county at a regular or special election held therein should assent thereto. . . . taking in this case the admission that the registration books offered in evidence contained the names of 1,940.....
Judgment:
Missouri ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pac. R. Co. v. Harris - 144 U.S. 210 (1892)
U.S. Supreme Court Missouri ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pac. R. Co. v. Harris, 144 U.S. 210 (1892)

Missouri ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri and Pacific Railroad Company v. Harris

No. 256

Argued March 29, 1892

Decided April 4, 1892

144 U.S. 210

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

Syllabus

No federal question is involved when the supreme court of a state decides that a municipal corporation within the state had not power, under the Constitution and laws of the state, to make the contract sued on.

Mandamus to compel the performance of an alleged subscription by Sullivan County, Missouri, to stock of a railroad company. The defense was that no valid subscription had been made under the Constitution and laws of Missouri. The supreme court of the state, in rendering the judgment to which this writ of error was sued out, said, in its opinion:

"The power of the county court to subscribe to the stock of a railroad company was made by the constitution of 1865 and Gen.Stat., 1865, p. 338, § 17, to depend upon the fact that two-thirds of the qualified voters of the county at a regular or special election held therein should assent thereto. . . . Taking in this case the admission that the registration books offered in evidence contained the names of 1,940 persons as qualified to vote in said county at said election, it is evident that two-thirds of the qualified voters of the County of Sullivan did not assent to said subscription, as only 1,049 of said voters voted in favor of the subscription. Besides this, while there was evidence tending to show that the railroad company had complied with the conditions of the subscription, there was also evidence to show that it had not complied, and the trial court might on this ground have well denied the relief asked. The judgment, for the reasons given, is hereby affirmed. "

Page 144 U. S. 211

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The writ of error is dismissed because no federal question is involved, upon the authority, among other cases, of Railroad Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177, 71 U. S. 181 ; Lehigh Water Co. v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388 ; N.O. Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U. S. 30 , and Railroad Co. v. Todd County, 142 U. S. 282 .

Writ of error dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //