Skip to content


Vincent Vs. People of State of California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number149 U.S. 648
AppellantVincent
RespondentPeople of State of California
Excerpt:
vincent v. people of state of california - 149 u.s. 648 (1893) u.s. supreme court vincent v. people of state of california, 149 u.s. 648 (1893) 149 u.s. 648 vincent v. people of state of california. no. 1,316. may 15, 1893. page 149 u.s. 648, 649 w. h. h. hart, atty. gen. cal., for the motion. carroll cook and g. r. b. hayes, opposed. mr. chief justice fuller. this case, which will be found reported in 95 cal. 425, 30 pac. rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of mcnulty, just considered. 13 sup. ct. rep. 959. for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.
Judgment:
VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA - 149 U.S. 648 (1893)
U.S. Supreme Court VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)

149 U.S. 648

VINCENT
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 1,316.

May 15, 1893.

Page 149 U.S. 648, 649

W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion.

Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30 Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //