Skip to content


Tioga R Co Vs. Com. of Pennsylvania - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number158 U.S. 440
AppellantTioga R Co
RespondentCom. of Pennsylvania
Excerpt:
.....e. & w. r. co. v. commonwealth of pennsylvania, 15 sup. ct. 896. they call for no additional consideration, and, for the reasons given in no. 263, the judgment of the court below in the several cases is affirmed. mr. justice harlan dissents. m. e. olmsted. for railroad cos. henry c. mccormick, atty. gen. pa., and jas. a. stranahan, for the commonwealth.
Judgment:
TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA - 158 U.S. 440 (1895)
U.S. Supreme Court TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 158 U.S. 440 (1895)

158 U.S. 440

TIOGA R. CO.
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.

NEW YORK, L. E. %& w. coal & railroad co./
v.
SAME.

NEW YORK, P. & O. R. CO.
v.
SAME.

Nos. 264, 265, and 266.

May 27, 1895

Mr. Justice SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court.

Page 158 U.S. 440, 441

are concerned, precisely like case No. 263, New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 15 Sup. Ct. 896. They call for no additional consideration, and, for the reasons given in No. 263, the judgment of the court below in the several cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents.

M. E. Olmsted. for Railroad Cos.

Henry C. McCormick, Atty. Gen. Pa., and Jas. A. Stranahan, for the Commonwealth.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //