Skip to content


Chicago, B and Q R Co Vs. City of Chicago - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number166 U.S. 258
AppellantChicago, B and Q R Co
RespondentCity of Chicago
Excerpt:
chicago, b & q r co v. city of chicago - 166 u.s. 258 (1897) u.s. supreme court chicago, b & q r co v. city of chicago, 166 u.s. 258 (1897) 166 u.s. 258 chicago. b. & q. r. co. v. city of chicago. no. 130. march 1, 1897 john j. herrick, for plaintiff in error. john s. miller, for defendant in error. mr. justice harlan delivered the opinion of the court. this was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of illinois similar to the one just disposed of. for the reasons stated in the above case (no. 129, 17 sup. ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of illinois is affirmed.
Judgment:
CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO - 166 U.S. 258 (1897)
U.S. Supreme Court CHICAGO, B & Q R CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 166 U.S. 258 (1897)

166 U.S. 258

CHICAGO. B. & Q. R. CO.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 130.

March 1, 1897

John J. Herrick, for plaintiff in error.

John S. Miller, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of.

For the reasons stated in the above case (No. 129, 17 Sup. Ct. 581), the judgment of the supreme court of Illinois is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //