Skip to content


Gallaway Vs. Fort Worth Bank - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number186 U.S. 177
AppellantGallaway
RespondentFort Worth Bank
Excerpt:
gallaway v. fort worth bank - 186 u.s. 177 (1902) u.s. supreme court gallaway v. fort worth bank, 186 u.s. 177 (1902) gallaway v. fort worth bank submitted may 19, 1902 186 u.s. 177 motion to sue out writ of error without giving bond required by law syllabus the act of congress of july 20, 1892, 27 stat. 252, has no application to proceedings in this court. the case is stated in the opinion. the chief justice. this is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of error to a state court without giving security page 186 u. s. 178 as required by section 1000 of the revised statutes, under an act of congress of july 20, 1892. 27 stat. 252. the motion must be denied. our ruling has uniformly been, and has.....
Judgment:
Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank - 186 U.S. 177 (1902)
U.S. Supreme Court Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 186 U.S. 177 (1902)

Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank

Submitted May 19, 1902

186 U.S. 177

MOTION TO SUE OUT WRIT OF ERROR

WITHOUT GIVING BOND REQUIRED BY LAW

Syllabus

The Act of Congress of July 20, 1892, 27 Stat. 252, has no application to proceedings in this Court.

The case is stated in the opinion.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of error to a state court without giving security

Page 186 U. S. 178

as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an Act of Congress of July 20, 1892. 27 Stat. 252.

The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances, that that act has no application to proceedings in this Court.

Motion denied.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //