Skip to content


Selden Vs. Montague - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number194 U.S. 153
AppellantSelden
RespondentMontague
Excerpt:
.....u.s. supreme court selden v. montague, 194 u.s. 153 (1904) 194 u.s. 153 william s. selden, william h. anderson, and clarence b. gilpin, appts., v. andrew j. montague, governor of virginia; david q. eggleston, secretary of the commonwealth of virginia; morton marye, auditor of public accounts of virginia, et al. no. 190. argued april 4, 5, 1904. decided april 25, 1904. mr. john s. wise for appellants. messrs. william a. anderson and frank w. christian for appellees. page 194 u.s. 153, 154 mr. justice brewer delivered the opinion of the court: this is a suit in equity brought to obtain by injunction the same relief as was sought in the preceding case. the facts and conditions are substantially similar, and for the reasons there.....
Judgment:
SELDEN v. MONTAGUE - 194 U.S. 153 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court SELDEN v. MONTAGUE, 194 U.S. 153 (1904)

194 U.S. 153

WILLIAM S. SELDEN, William H. Anderson, and Clarence B. Gilpin, Appts.,
v.
ANDREW J. MONTAGUE, Governor of Virginia; David Q. Eggleston, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Morton Marye, Auditor of Public Accounts of Virginia, et al.
No. 190.

Argued April 4, 5, 1904.
Decided April 25, 1904.

Mr. John S. Wise for appellants.

Messrs. William A. Anderson and Frank W. Christian for appellees.

Page 194 U.S. 153, 154

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit in equity brought to obtain by injunction the same relief as was sought in the preceding case. The facts and conditions are substantially similar, and for the reasons there given the appeal will be dismissed without costs to either party.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //