Skip to content


Buttfield Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number192 U.S. 499
AppellantButtfield
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
buttfield v. united states - 192 u.s. 499 (1904) u.s. supreme court buttfield v. united states, 192 u.s. 499 (1904) buttfield v. united states no. 516 argued january 4, 1904 decided february 23, 1904 192 u.s. 499 error to the district court of the united states for the eastern district of new york syllabus decided on authority of buttfield v. stranahan, ante, p. 192 u. s. 470 . mr. justice white delivered the opinion of the court. this was a proceeding for the condemnation of seven packages page 192 u. s. 500 of tea which had been reimported after export from this country upon a final rejection of the tea by the board of general appraisers as not entitled to admission into the united.....
Judgment:
Buttfield v. United States - 192 U.S. 499 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court Buttfield v. United States, 192 U.S. 499 (1904)

Buttfield v. United States

No. 516

Argued January 4, 1904

Decided February 23, 1904

192 U.S. 499

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Syllabus

Decided on authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan, ante, p. 192 U. S. 470 .

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a proceeding for the condemnation of seven packages

Page 192 U. S. 500

of tea which had been reimported after export from this country upon a final rejection of the tea by the Board of General Appraisers as not entitled to admission into the United States for consumption under the Tea Inspection Act of March 2, 1897. Buttfield appeared as claimant, and a demurrer filed on his behalf to the information was overruled. The claimant failing to plead further, a final decree and judgment of forfeiture was entered. A reversal is asked upon the sole ground that the Act of March 2, 1897, referred to, is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. Upon the authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan, just decided, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER and MR. JUSTICE BROWN took no part in the decision of this case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //