Skip to content


Dones Vs. Urrutia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number202 U.S. 614
AppellantDones
RespondentUrrutia
Excerpt:
.....code of civ. proc. 1904, pp. 103, 104, 110; ex parte ward, 173 u.s. 454, 43 l. ed. 765, 19 sup. ct. rep. 459; united states v. bellingham bay boom co., 176 u.s. 214, 44 l. ed. 440, 20 sup. ct. rep. 343. .....
Judgment:
DONES v. URRUTIA - 202 U.S. 614 (1906)
U.S. Supreme Court DONES v. URRUTIA, 202 U.S. 614 (1906)

202 U.S. 614

FRANCISCO DONES, Appellant,
v.
JOSE URRUTIA, Warden of the Penitentiary of Porto Rico.
No. 685.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 1906

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and J. Spalding Flannery for appellant.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for appellee.

Final order affirmed with costs. Act April 12, 1900 (31 Stat. at L. 77, chap. 191, 15, 33, 34, 35); Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339 , 50 L. ed . --, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80 , 50 L. ed. --, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Porto Rican Laws & Code of Civ. Proc. 1904, pp. 103, 104, 110; Ex parte Ward, 173 U.S. 454, 43 L. ed. 765, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 459; United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co., 176 U.S. 214, 44 L. ed. 440, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 343.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //