Skip to content


Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Ry. Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number209 U.S. 90
AppellantChicago, Burlington and Quincy Ry. Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
chicago, burlington & quincy ry. co. v. united states - 209 u.s. 90 (1908) u.s. supreme court chicago, burlington & quincy ry. co. v. united states, 209 u.s. 90 (1908) chicago, burlington & quincy railway company v. united states no. 552 submitted january 22, 1908 decided march 16, 1908 209 u.s. 90 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit syllabus decided on the authority of armour packing co. v. united states, ante, p. 209 u. s. 66 . the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. justice day delivered the opinion of the court. the counsel for the petitioner and the solicitor general for the united states having filed a stipulation in writing in this cause, agreeing.....
Judgment:
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. United States - 209 U.S. 90 (1908)
U.S. Supreme Court Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 90 (1908)

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway

Company v. United States

No. 552

Submitted January 22, 1908

Decided March 16, 1908

209 U.S. 90

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of Armour Packing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 209 U. S. 66 .

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The counsel for the petitioner and the Solicitor General for the United States having filed a stipulation in writing in this cause, agreeing to abide the result of the Packing Company cases, just decided (Nos. 467, 468, 469, and 470), it is hereby ordered that the judgment of the circuit court of appeals in this case be affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MOODY took no part in the disposition of this case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //