Skip to content


LOGAN Vs. FARMERS' DEPOSiT NAT BANK OF PiTTSBURGH, PA - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number214 U.S. 500
AppellantLOGAN
RespondentFARMERS' DEPOSiT NAT BANK OF PiTTSBURGH, PA
Excerpt:
logan v. farmers' deposit nat bank of pittsburgh, pa - 214 u.s. 500 (1909) u.s. supreme court logan v. farmers' deposit nat bank of pittsburgh, pa, 214 u.s. 500 (1909) 214 u.s. 500 frank j. logan et al., appellants, v. farmers' deposit national bank of pittsburgh, pa. et al. no. 745. april 26, 1909 messrs. a. leo weil and b. m. ambler for appellees. page 214 u.s. 500, 501 mr. hector m. hitchings for appellants. per curiam: appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of coder v. arts, decided april 5, 1909, 213 u.s. 223 , 53 l. ed. --, 29 sup. ct. rep. 436.
Judgment:
LOGAN v. FARMERS' DEPOSIT NAT BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA - 214 U.S. 500 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court LOGAN v. FARMERS' DEPOSIT NAT BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 214 U.S. 500 (1909)

214 U.S. 500

FRANK J. LOGAN et al., Appellants,
v.
FARMERS' DEPOSIT NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH, PA. et al.
No. 745.

April 26, 1909

Messrs. A. Leo Weil and B. M. Ambler for appellees.

Page 214 U.S. 500, 501

Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for appellants.

Per Curiam:

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Coder v. Arts, decided April 5, 1909, 213 U.S. 223 , 53 L. ed. --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 436.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //