Skip to content


Chicago and a R. Co. Vs. U S - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number212 U.S. 563
AppellantChicago and a R. Co.
RespondentU S
Excerpt:
chicago & a r. co. v. u s - 212 u.s. 563 (1909) u.s. supreme court chicago & a r. co. v. u s, 212 u.s. 563 (1909) 212 u.s. 563 chicago & alton railway company, petitioner, v. united states no. 238. john n. faithorn, petitioner, v. united states no. 239. fred a. wann, petitioner, v. united states no. 240. january 4, 1909 messrs. f. s. winston, robert mather, john barton payne, s. h. strawn, ralph m. shaw, and blackburn esterline for petitioners. the attorney general and the solicitor general for respondent. judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the district court of the united states for the northern district of illinois.[ chicago & a r co v. u s 212 u.s. 563 (1909) ]
Judgment:
CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S - 212 U.S. 563 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)

212 U.S. 563

CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.

JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 239.

FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 240.

January 4, 1909

Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.

Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //