Skip to content


Converse Vs. Aetna Nat Bank - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number212 U.S. 567
AppellantConverse
RespondentAetna Nat Bank
Excerpt:
..... per curiam: judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of bernheimer v. converse, 206 u.s. 516 , 51 l. ed. 1163, 27 sup. ct. rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law. .....
Judgment:
CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK - 212 U.S. 567 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK, 212 U.S. 567 (1909)

212 U.S. 567

THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error,
v.
AETNA NATIONAL BANK
No. 75.

THEODORE R. CONVERSE, Receiver, etc Plaintiff in Error,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD

No. 76.

January 25, 1909.

Page 212 U.S. 567, 568

Messrs. William Waldo Hyde and Charles Welles Gross for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Gardiner Greene, Frank T. Browne, and Charles E. Serles for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Judgments reversed with costs, on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516 , 51 L. ed. 1163, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 755, and cases remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //