Skip to content


Mccarthy Vs. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating C - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number212 U.S. 569
AppellantMccarthy
RespondentBunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating C
Excerpt:
mccarthy v. bunker hill & sullivan mining & concentrating c - 212 u.s. 569 (1909) u.s. supreme court mccarthy v. bunker hill & sullivan mining & concentrating c, 212 u.s. 569 (1909) 212 u.s. 569 ex parte: in the matter of the dowagiac manufacturing company, petitioner. no. ___, original. february 1, 1909 messrs. fred l. chappell, morison r. waite, and edmund wetmore for petitioner. denied.[ mccarthy v. bunker hill & sullivan mining & concentrating c 212 u.s. 569 (1909) ]
Judgment:
MCCARTHY v. BUNKER HILL & SULLIVAN MINING & CONCENTRATING C - 212 U.S. 569 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court MCCARTHY v. BUNKER HILL & SULLIVAN MINING & CONCENTRATING C, 212 U.S. 569 (1909)

212 U.S. 569

EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE DOWAGIAC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner.

No. ___, Original.

February 1, 1909

Messrs. Fred L. Chappell, Morison R. Waite, and Edmund Wetmore for petitioner.

Denied.[ McCarthy v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating C 212 U.S. 569 (1909) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //