Skip to content


Siler Vs. Illinois Central Railroad Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number213 U.S. 199
AppellantSiler
Respondentillinois Central Railroad Co.
Excerpt:
siler v. illinois central railroad co. - 213 u.s. 199 (1909) u.s. supreme court siler v. illinois central railroad co., 213 u.s. 199 (1909) 213 u.s. 199 siler et al., as railroad commission, appts., v. illinois central railroad company. no. 522. siler et al., as railroad commission, appts., v. southern railway company in kentucky. no. 523. siler et al., as railroad commission, appts., v. cincinnati, new orleans, & texas pacific railway company. no. 524. no. 522, 523, 524. supreme court of the united states argued february 24, 25, 26, 1909 april 5, 1909 messrs. c. c. mcchord, robert h. winn, and james breathitt for appellants. messrs. edmund f. trabue, john c. doolan, attilla cox, jr., and j. m......
Judgment:
SILER v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. - 213 U.S. 199 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court SILER v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., 213 U.S. 199 (1909)

213 U.S. 199

SILER et al., as Railroad Commission, Appts.,
v.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 522.

SILER et al., as Railroad Commission, Appts.,
v.
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY IN KENTUCKY.

No. 523.

SILER et al., as Railroad Commission, Appts.,
v.
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS, & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.

No. 524.

No. 522, 523, 524.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 24, 25, 26, 1909

April 5, 1909

Messrs. C. C. McChord, Robert H. Winn, and James Breathitt for appellants.

Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue, John C. Doolan, Attilla Cox, Jr., and J. M. Dickinson for appellee in No. 522.

Mr. Alexander Pope Humphrey for appellee in No. 523.

Messrs. John Galvin, Edward Colston, and Maurice L. Galvin for appellee in No. 524.

Page 213 U.S. 199, 200

By Mr. Justice Peckham:

The above-entitled cases raise the same question that is decided in Siler v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 213 U.S. 175 , 53 L. ed. 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 451, and, upon its authority, the decrees in the above cases are affirmed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //