Skip to content


Sass and Crawford Vs. Thomas - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number214 U.S. 489
AppellantSass and Crawford
RespondentThomas
Excerpt:
sass & crawford v. thomas - 214 u.s. 489 (1909) u.s. supreme court sass & crawford v. thomas, 214 u.s. 489 (1909) 214 u.s. 489 sass & crawford, plaintiffs in error, v. minnie thomas and charley thomas. no. 112. march 22, 1909. page 214 u.s. 489, 490 messrs. w. a. ledbetter and s. t. bledsoe for plaintiffs in error. messrs. a. c. cruce and w. i. cruce for defendants in error. per curiam: the writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of laurel oil & gas co. v. morrison, 212 u.s. 291 , 53 l. ed . --, 29 sup. ct. rep. 394, decided on february 23, last.
Judgment:
SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS - 214 U.S. 489 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS, 214 U.S. 489 (1909)

214 U.S. 489

SASS & CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.
No. 112.

March 22, 1909.

Page 214 U.S. 489, 490

Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291 , 53 L. ed . --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //