Skip to content


St. Paul, M. and M.R. Co. Vs. Minnesota Ex Rel. City of Minneapolis - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number214 U.S. 497
AppellantSt. Paul, M. and M.R. Co.
RespondentMinnesota Ex Rel. City of Minneapolis
Excerpt:
st. paul, m. & m.r. co. v. minnesota ex rel. city of minneapolis - 214 u.s. 497 (1909) u.s. supreme court st. paul, m. & m.r. co. v. minnesota ex rel. city of minneapolis, 214 u.s. 497 (1909) 214 u.s. 497 st. paul, minneapolis, & manitoba railway company and great northern railway company, plaintiffs in error, v. state of minnesota ex rel. city of minneapolis. no. 162. april 26, 1909. page 214 u.s. 497, 498 messrs. rome g. brown, william r. begg, and charles s. albert for plaintiffs in error. messrs. frank healy and albert e. clarke for defendant in error. per curiam: judgment affirmed on authority of northern p. r. co. v. minnesota, 208 u.s. 583 , 52 l. ed. 630, 28 sup. ct. rep. 341.
Judgment:
ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS - 214 U.S. 497 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court ST. PAUL, M. & M.R. CO. v. MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 214 U.S. 497 (1909)

214 U.S. 497

ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS, & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY and Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.
No. 162.

April 26, 1909.

Page 214 U.S. 497, 498

Messrs. Rome G. Brown, William R. Begg, and Charles S. Albert for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Frank Healy and Albert E. Clarke for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U.S. 583 , 52 L. ed. 630, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //