Skip to content


Jerome H. Remick and Co. Vs. Stern - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number215 U.S. 585
AppellantJerome H. Remick and Co.
RespondentStern
Excerpt:
jerome h. remick & co. v. stern - 215 u.s. 585 (1909) u.s. supreme court jerome h. remick & co. v. stern, 215 u.s. 585 (1909) 215 u.s. 585 jerome h. remick & company, plaintiff in error, v. joseph w. stern and edward b. marks. no. 352. supreme court of the united states november 15, 1909 mr. moses h. grossman for plaintiff in error. mr. julius henry cohen for defendants in error. per curiam: writ of error dismissed for want of final judgment. mclish v. roff, 141 u.s. 661 , 35 l. ed. 893, 12 sup. ct. rep. 118; pfaelzer v. bach fur co., 215 u.s. 584, 54 l. ed. --, 30 sup. ct. rep. 403, nov. 8, 1909.
Judgment:
JEROME H. REMICK & CO. v. STERN - 215 U.S. 585 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court JEROME H. REMICK & CO. v. STERN, 215 U.S. 585 (1909)

215 U.S. 585

JEROME H. REMICK & COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
JOSEPH W. STERN and Edward B. Marks.
No. 352.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1909

Mr. Moses H. Grossman for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Julius Henry Cohen for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writ of Error dismissed for want of final judgment. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661 , 35 L. ed. 893, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Co., 215 U.S. 584, 54 L. Ed. --, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 403, Nov. 8, 1909.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //