Skip to content


Guaranty Trust Co. of New York Vs. Metropolitan St Ry. Co - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number215 U.S. 587
AppellantGuaranty Trust Co. of New York
RespondentMetropolitan St Ry. Co
Excerpt:
..... v. metropolitan street railway company et al. no. 607. supreme court of the united states november 15, 1909 messrs. julien t. davies, brainard tolles, and john c. spooner for appellant. messrs. j. parker kirlin, arthur h. masten, bronson winthrop, frank h. platt, james byrne, and matthew c. fleming for appellees. per curiam: appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. carey v. houston & t. c. r. co. 150 u.s. 170 , 37 l. ed. 1041, 14 sup. ct. rep. 63; re lennon, 150 u.s. 393 , 37 l. ed. 1120, 14 sup. ct. rep. 123; cornell v. green, 163 u.s. 75 , 41 l. ed. 76, 16 sup. ct. rep. 969; empire state- idanho min. & developing co. v. hanley, 205 u.s. 225 , 51 l. ed. 779, 27 sup. ct. rep. 476; goodrich v. ferris, 214 u.s. 71 ,.....
Judgment:
GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO - 215 U.S. 587 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. METROPOLITAN ST RY. CO, 215 U.S. 587 (1909)

215 U.S. 587

GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al.
No. 607.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1909

Messrs. Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles, and John C. Spooner for appellant.

Messrs. J. Parker Kirlin, Arthur H. Masten, Bronson Winthrop, Frank H. Platt, James Byrne, and Matthew C. Fleming for appellees.

Per Curiam: Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & T. C. R. Co. 150 U.S. 170 , 37 L. ed. 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 63; Re Lennon, 150 U.S. 393 , 37 L. ed. 1120, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Cornell v. Green, 163 U.S. 75 , 41 L. ed. 76, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 969; Empire State- Idanho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225 , 51 L. ed. 779, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71 , 53 L. ed. 914, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580; Farrell v. O'Brien (O'Callaghan v. O'Brien) 199 U.S. 89 , 50 L. ed. 101, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 727; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.S. 225 , 48 L. ed. 159, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; United States v. Larkin, 208 U.S. 333 , 52 L. ed. 517, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, 208 U.S. 360 , 52 L. ed. 528, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 406, 13 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1155; Bien v. Robinson, 208 U.S. 423 , 52 L. ed. 556, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 379; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U.S. 324 , 52 L. ed. 1080, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 732; and see Re Metropolitan R. Receivership (Re Reisenberg) 208 U.S. 90 , 52 L. ed. 403, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 166 Fed. 569, 168 Fed. 937, 170 Fed. 335, 625, 626, 171 Fed. 1014, 1015, 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. R. Co. 171 Fed. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. 170 Fed. 623.[ Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. Metropolitan St Ry Co 215 U.S. 587 (1909) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //