Skip to content


Kansas City Star Co. Vs. Julian - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number215 U.S. 589
AppellantKansas City Star Co.
RespondentJulian
Excerpt:
kansas city star co. v. julian - 215 u.s. 589 (1909) u.s. supreme court kansas city star co. v. julian, 215 u.s. 589 (1909) 215 u.s. 589 kansas city star company, plaintiff in error, v. henry s. julian. no. 85. supreme court of the united states december 6, 1909 messrs. isaac n. watson, hannis taylor, wash. adams, and frank hagerman for plaintiff in error. messrs. john h. atwood, o. h. dean, and ira julian for defendant in error. per curiam: writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. sayward v. denny, 158 u.s. 180 , 39 l. ed. 941, 15 sup. ct. rep. 777; mutual l. ins. co. v. mcgrew, 188 u.s. 291, 307 , 308 s., 47 l. ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 l.r.a. 33, 23 sup. ct. rep. 375; state ex rel. horton v. bland, 186 .....
Judgment:
KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN - 215 U.S. 589 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court KANSAS CITY STAR CO. v. JULIAN, 215 U.S. 589 (1909)

215 U.S. 589

KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
HENRY S. JULIAN.
No. 85.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1909

Messrs. Isaac N. Watson, Hannis Taylor, Wash. Adams, and Frank Hagerman for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. John H. Atwood, O. H. Dean, and Ira Julian for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180 , 39 L. ed. 941, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 777; Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 307 , 308 S., 47 L. ed. 480, 484, 485, 63 L.R.A. 33, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 375; State ex rel. Horton v. Bland, 186

Page 215 U.S. 589, 590

Mo. 701, 85 S. W. 561; F. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U.S. 653, 41 L. ed. 1151, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 709.

The attention of the state supreme court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U.S. 580, 585 , 37 S. L. ed. 856, 859, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 934, and cases.

The judgment rested on non Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. Cincinnati Street R. Co. v. Snell, 193 U.S. 30 , 48 L. ed. 604, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 319; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322 , 53 L. ed. 530, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 370.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //