Skip to content


Shine Vs. Fox Bros Mfg Co - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number216 U.S. 609
AppellantShine
RespondentFox Bros Mfg Co
Excerpt:
shine v. fox bros mfg co - 216 u.s. 609 (1910) u.s. supreme court shine v. fox bros mfg co, 216 u.s. 609 (1910) 216 u.s. 609 james a. shine et al., appellants, v. fox brothers manufacturing company. no 383. supreme court of the united states march 7, 1910 messrs. shepard barclay, thomas t. fauntleroy, and cornelius h. fauntleroy for appellants. messrs. herbert r. marlatt and frank h. sullivan for appellee. per curiam: in the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ shine v. fox bros mfg co 216 u.s. 609 (1910) ]
Judgment:
SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO - 216 U.S. 609 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court SHINE v. FOX BROS MFG CO, 216 U.S. 609 (1910)

216 U.S. 609

JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

No 383.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 7, 1910

Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants.

Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee.

Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.[ Shine v. Fox Bros Mfg Co 216 U.S. 609 (1910) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //